Abbott Laboratories ABT
Abbott's FY2025 fundamentals show genuine operational improvement — revenue of $44.3B grew 5.67% YoY, gross margin expanded to 55.5%, operating margin reached 18.2%, and free cash flow hit $7.4B — but the 51.3% YoY EPS decline to $3.72 (against FY2024's elevated $7.64) clouds the normalized earnings picture. The stock has cooled from prior overbought conditions (RSI now 52.9 versus the prior verdict's 72.8) and trades at a P/S of 4.1x and EV/EBITDA of 22.0x, both below the peer median, yet the P/E of 35.5x remains at a ~22% premium.
Recent FDA and CE Mark regulatory wins in diabetes and structural heart add credible growth catalysts, but with smart money still slightly negative (-0.05 as of Q2 2026) and the EPS reset fresh, patience is warranted until the earnings trajectory clarifies.
What could go wrong
- EPS normalization uncertainty. FY2024 net income of $13.4B on $6.8B operating income versus FY2025's $6.5B on $8.0B suggests a one-time gain inflated the prior base; the market may still be repricing to the lower normalized figure.
- Valuation premium. P/E of 35.5x sits ~22% above the peer median of 29.1x, limiting margin of safety even as P/S and EV/EBITDA come in below median.
- Insider selling signals. CEO Robert Ford exercised options and sold shares on 2026-08-25 at ~$116, netting zero incremental common stock; while routine, it provides no incremental insider conviction at current levels.
- Smart money positioning. Smart money score of -0.046 as of Q2 2026, while improving from -0.092 in Q4 2025, remains in negative territory across 66 funds.
What would change my mind
Where this comes from: FMP FY2025 + derived_metrics · derived_metrics FY2025 · FMP FY2025 · FMP FY2025 + derived_metrics. Orin's read on ABT; not advice.
Twelve months actual closes to 2026-09-23 · actual filings
50-day average 200-day average · volume below
On file
All ABT filingsLargest holders · 13F Q2 2026
Money flow| Filer | Position | Of fund |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Capital Management | $10.3B | 0.2% of fund |
| State Street | $7.3B | 0.2% of fund |
| Charles Schwab Investment Management | $5.4B | 0.7% of fund |
| Vanguard Portfolio Management | $4.4B | 0.2% of fund |
| Geode Capital Management | $3.5B | 0.2% of fund |
| Capital Research Global Investors | $3.3B | 0.5% of fund |
158 filers · quarter ended Q2 2026 · positions, not flows
Insiders, last 24 months: 117 Form 4 filings, net $66.0M. Of the 50 on hand, 2 were open-market purchases and 10 sales— the rest are grants, option exercises and tax withholding.
Ask Orin about ABT
Orin answers questions about ABT from its filings, transcripts and numbers — with the source behind every claim. Your own desk starts with 3 free days, card required.
Start 3 free days →Where it trades
| Metric | Now | Own median | Sector |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 33.3× | 33.4× | 26.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.8× | 18.8× | — |
| P/S | 3.85× | 4.76× | — |
| P/B | 3.5× | 4.9× | — |
Its P/E sits 40th percentile of its own last 5 years (+0.58σ from its own mean).
10.3%
free-cash-flow growth every year for 10 years, discounted at 10%, is what today’s price implies — starting from $7.4B of trailing free cash flow. It is an assumption the market is making, not a forecast Orin is making.
What Wall Street published
$122
$92 – $143 · +17% against today's price
- 32 buy or overweight
- 9 hold
- 0 underweight or sell
The analysts’ consensus and their own ratings, not Orin’s. A target is a twelve-month opinion published by the firm that wrote it.
Against the companies it is compared to
| Company | Market cap | P/E | EV/EBITDA | Gross | Net | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | $179B | 33.3× | 20.8× | 56.8% | 11.6% | 11% |
| BSXBoston Scientific Corporation | $66B | 18.0× | 13.8× | 71.2% | 17.5% | 15% |
| GILDGilead Sciences, Inc. | $188B | — | 331.4× | 79.6% | -10.6% | -16% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical, Inc. | $141B | 45.0× | 30.6× | 66.7% | 28.4% | 18% |
| MDTMedtronic plc | $114B | 21.8× | 14.9× | 66.7% | 13.9% | 11% |
| MRKMerck & Co., Inc. | $366B | 117.5× | 29.8× | 75.4% | 4.8% | 7% |
| SYKStryker Corporation | $105B | 28.1× | 18.6× | 65.2% | 14.4% | 16% |
| TMOThermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | $246B | 35.7× | 26.0× | 41.0% | 15.1% | 13% |
| UNHUnitedHealth Group Incorporated | $337B | 23.9× | 14.8× | 22.5% | 3.1% | 15% |
The median is of the 7 peers listed above and nothing else — check it against the column. This company trades 18.5% above it. The peer set is the vendor’s, so a company can appear here that a person would not have chosen.
What it has traded at
What its sector has traded at
Two scales, drawn separately on purpose: a sector median and one company’s multiple are not the same number and putting them on one axis invites a comparison neither series supports.
Discounted cash flow
| Model | Fair value | Against | Computed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard DCF | $149 | $89.08 · +67% | 2026-06-10 |
| Levered DCF | $127 | $89.08 · +43% | 2026-06-10 |
The vendor’s intrinsic-value models. Treat them as a low-growth anchor — for a fast grower the market routinely pays well above a DCF. These were computed against the price in the “against” column, not today’s.
Every estimate on one scale
The vertical rule is the current price. Ranges and point estimates are the backend’s, published as they were calculated; an arrow means the estimate sits beyond this scale, and its number is on the right.