CRH plc CRH
CRH trades at a 54% PE discount and 60% EV/EBITDA discount to its basic-materials peer median despite growing revenue from $25.8B in 2021 to $37.4B in 2025 and expanding operating margins from 11.4% to 14.2%. Record Q2 2026 results with pricing momentum and resilient infrastructure demand reinforce the growth trajectory, while the $8.5B Arcosa acquisition deepens U.S. aggregates exposure in a high-demand market.
The stock's pullback below both the 50-day ($103.77) and 200-day ($113.01) moving averages to $97.15 creates an attractive entry for a company generating $2.9B in annual free cash flow, though total debt nearly doubling to $19.7B over four years tempers conviction.
What could go wrong
- Debt acceleration. Total debt rose from $10.7B (2021) to $19.7B (2025); the $8.5B Arcosa deal will likely push leverage higher, pressuring balance sheet flexibility.
- Housing weakness. Subdued residential activity weighed on some Q2 segments; a prolonged housing downturn could offset infrastructure tailwinds.
- Technical downtrend. Stock at $97.15 trades below both the 50-day ($103.77) and 200-day ($113.01) moving averages, indicating negative momentum that could persist.
- Integration and financing risk. The Arcosa deal adds execution complexity on top of recent Utah acquisitions; integration missteps or unfavorable financing terms could erode shareholder value.
What would change my mind
Where this comes from: FMP annual fundamentals · peer_relative composite · peer_relative composite · FMP annual fundamentals. Orin's read on CRH; not advice.
Twelve months actual closes to 2026-09-23 · actual filings
50-day average 200-day average · volume below
On file
All CRH filingsLargest holders · 13F Q2 2024
Money flow| Filer | Position | Of fund |
|---|---|---|
| Scopus Asset Management, L.P | $53.9M | 1.1% of fund |
| Lattice Capital Management | $435K | 0.0% of fund |
2 filers · quarter ended Q2 2024 · positions, not flows
Insiders, last 24 months: 125 Form 4 filings, net −$22.2M. Of the 50 on hand, 0 were open-market purchases and 1 a sale— the rest are grants, option exercises and tax withholding.
Ask Orin about CRH
Orin answers questions about CRH from its filings, transcripts and numbers — with the source behind every claim. Your own desk starts with 3 free days, card required.
Start 3 free days →Where it trades
| Metric | Now | Own median | Sector |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 19.2× | 18.2× | 29.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.8× | 10.4× | — |
| P/S | 2.61× | 1.60× | — |
| P/B | 2.4× | 2.6× | — |
Its P/E sits 80th percentile of its own last 5 years (+0.54σ from its own mean).
7.4%
free-cash-flow growth every year for 10 years, discounted at 10%, is what today’s price implies — starting from $2.9B of trailing free cash flow. It is an assumption the market is making, not a forecast Orin is making.
What Wall Street published
$136
$107 – $166 · +60% against today's price
- 15 buy or overweight
- 6 hold
- 0 underweight or sell
The analysts’ consensus and their own ratings, not Orin’s. A target is a twelve-month opinion published by the firm that wrote it.
Against the companies it is compared to
| Company | Market cap | P/E | EV/EBITDA | Gross | Net | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRHCRH plc | $57B | 19.2× | 12.8× | 39.4% | 13.7% | 14% |
| ECLEcolab Inc. | $78B | 36.9× | 25.9× | 44.1% | 12.6% | 21% |
| FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc. | $104B | 35.8× | 12.3× | 26.8% | 11.4% | 15% |
| MLMMartin Marietta Materials, Inc. | $29B | 12.0× | 16.9× | 28.2% | 36.8% | 23% |
| NEMNewmont Corporation | $130B | 15.5× | 8.7× | 54.5% | 38.1% | 25% |
| SHWThe Sherwin-Williams Company | $79B | 29.8× | 20.9× | 49.1% | 11.0% | 62% |
| VMCVulcan Materials Company | $32B | 28.8× | 14.2× | 27.4% | 13.8% | 13% |
The median is of the 6 peers listed above and nothing else — check it against the column. This company trades 34.6% below it. The peer set is the vendor’s, so a company can appear here that a person would not have chosen.
What it has traded at
What its sector has traded at
Two scales, drawn separately on purpose: a sector median and one company’s multiple are not the same number and putting them on one axis invites a comparison neither series supports.
Every estimate on one scale
The vertical rule is the current price. Ranges and point estimates are the backend’s, published as they were calculated; an arrow means the estimate sits beyond this scale, and its number is on the right.