Halliburton Company HAL
Halliburton remains a hold as the fundamental deterioration in FY2025 — EPS falling 47% to $1.50 and operating margin compressing from 16.66% to 10.19% — is only partially offset by improving technicals and a fresh pipeline of Brazil contract wins from BP and Petrobras. The stock has broken above both its 50-day ($33.85) and 200-day ($34.55) moving averages to $36.18 with a bullish MACD histogram of +0.26, and BNY Mellon's new ~$337M position signals institutional interest, but HAL still trades at a 69% P/E premium to the peer median of 11.19 despite sharply declining earnings.
Persistent insider net selling of $28.3M over 24 months and a near-zero smart money score of 0.0084 as of Q2 2026 provide no contrarian support, making it premature to turn constructive until earnings stabilization is confirmed.
What could go wrong
- Margin compression persists. FY2025 gross margin fell to 15.71% from 18.75% and operating margin to 10.19% from 16.66%; if this trajectory continues into FY2026, the valuation premium becomes untenable.
- Valuation premium on declining earnings. P/E of 18.93 sits 69% above the peer median of 11.19, and EV/EBITDA of 8.77 is 23% above the peer median of 7.11, despite EPS falling 47% in FY2025.
- Insider selling acceleration. Net insider disposition of 670,224 shares worth $28.3M over 24 months, with CEO and COO selling in August 2026 at ~$35/share, signals limited management confidence in near-term upside.
- Smart money indifference. Smart money score of 0.0084 as of 2026-06-30 is near zero and down from 0.0298 in Q1 2026, indicating institutional positioning is flat to slightly positive but not building conviction.
What would change my mind
Where this comes from: FMP annual fundamentals FY2025 vs FY2024 · derived_metrics FY2024 vs FY2025 · technicals as of 2026-08-28 · peer_relative composite. Orin's read on HAL; not advice.
Twelve months actual closes to 2026-09-24 · actual filings
50-day average 200-day average · volume below
On file
All HAL filingsLargest holders · 13F Q2 2026
Money flow| Filer | Position | Of fund |
|---|---|---|
| State Street | $1.9B | 0.1% of fund |
| Vanguard Capital Management | $1.8B | 0.0% of fund |
| Vanguard Portfolio Management | $1.4B | 0.1% of fund |
| Geode Capital Management | $760.4M | 0.0% of fund |
| Morgan Stanley | $565.5M | 0.0% of fund |
| Aqr Capital Management | $403.0M | 0.1% of fund |
114 filers · quarter ended Q2 2026 · positions, not flows
Insiders, last 24 months: 98 Form 4 filings, net −$29.2M. Of the 50 on hand, 0 were open-market purchases and 20 sales— the rest are grants, option exercises and tax withholding.
Ask Orin about HAL
Orin answers questions about HAL from its filings, transcripts and numbers — with the source behind every claim. Your own desk starts with 3 free days, card required.
Start 3 free days →Where it trades
| Metric | Now | Own median | Sector |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 17.1× | 14.0× | 51.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.1× | 7.7× | — |
| P/S | 1.22× | 1.33× | — |
| P/B | 2.5× | 3.0× | — |
Its P/E sits 60th percentile of its own last 5 years (+0.38σ from its own mean).
5.0%
free-cash-flow growth every year for 10 years, discounted at 10%, is what today’s price implies — starting from $1.7B of trailing free cash flow. It is an assumption the market is making, not a forecast Orin is making.
What Wall Street published
$43
$37 – $53 · +32% against today's price
- 47 buy or overweight
- 15 hold
- 2 underweight or sell
The analysts’ consensus and their own ratings, not Orin’s. A target is a twelve-month opinion published by the firm that wrote it.
Against the companies it is compared to
| Company | Market cap | P/E | EV/EBITDA | Gross | Net | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALHalliburton Company | $27B | 17.1× | 8.1× | 15.1% | 7.2% | 15% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corporation | $54B | 11.6× | 7.3× | 34.0% | 16.7% | 15% |
| EXEExpand Energy Corporation | $21B | 7.6× | 3.5× | 63.1% | 20.8% | 15% |
| TPLTexas Pacific Land Corporation | $23B | 43.1× | 31.0× | 100.3% | 60.3% | 36% |
The median is of the 3 peers listed above and nothing else — check it against the column. This company trades 48.3% above it. The peer set is the vendor’s, so a company can appear here that a person would not have chosen.
What it has traded at
What its sector has traded at
Two scales, drawn separately on purpose: a sector median and one company’s multiple are not the same number and putting them on one axis invites a comparison neither series supports.
Discounted cash flow
| Model | Fair value | Against | Computed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard DCF | $70 | $40.25 · +74% | 2026-06-10 |
| Levered DCF | $60 | $40.25 · +48% | 2026-06-10 |
The vendor’s intrinsic-value models. Treat them as a low-growth anchor — for a fast grower the market routinely pays well above a DCF. These were computed against the price in the “against” column, not today’s.
Every estimate on one scale
The vertical rule is the current price. Ranges and point estimates are the backend’s, published as they were calculated; an arrow means the estimate sits beyond this scale, and its number is on the right.