Quanta Services, Inc. PWR
Quanta Services remains a hold as the fundamental growth story is exceptional — revenue has compounded from $13.0B in 2021 to $28.4B in 2025 with FCF expanding over 8x to $1.62B, and management's raised 2026 FCF outlook to $2–$2.5B signals continued momentum in AI-driven power infrastructure demand. However, at 77.6x trailing earnings versus a peer median of 28.8x (a 170% premium) and 36.0x EV/EBITDA versus 18.3x, the stock demands years of flawless execution with minimal margin for error.
Persistent net insider selling of $176.9M over 24 months, a 43% YoY jump in total debt to $6.4B, and a declining smart money score from 0.43 to 0.13 temper enthusiasm despite the improving technical picture (price back above the 50-day MA at $672.82 with a bullish MACD crossover).
What could go wrong
- Valuation compression. At 77.6x PE and 36.0x EV/EBITDA — 170% and 96% above peer medians respectively — any deceleration in revenue growth or margin guidance could trigger a sharp multiple contraction.
- Leverage acceleration. Total debt surged 43% YoY from $4.48B in 2024 to $6.42B in 2025, outpacing equity growth; rising rates or project cost overruns could pressure coverage.
- Insider distribution. Net insider selling of $176.9M and 107,115 net shares disposed over 24 months with no cluster buying suggests insiders view current levels as attractive exit points.
- Smart money fading. Smart money score declined from 0.4268 in Q1 2026 to 0.1319 in Q2 2026 with fund count dropping from 62 to 58, indicating institutional conviction is waning at these levels.
What would change my mind
Where this comes from: FMP fundamentals, fiscal years 2021–2025 · FMP fundamentals, fiscal years 2021–2025 · peer_relative composite · peer_relative composite. Orin's read on PWR; not advice.
Twelve months actual closes to 2026-09-23 · actual filings
50-day average 200-day average · volume below
On file
All PWR filingsLargest holders · 13F Q2 2026
Money flow| Filer | Position | Of fund |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Capital Management | $7.1B | 0.2% of fund |
| Vanguard Portfolio Management | $5.0B | 0.2% of fund |
| State Street | $4.7B | 0.1% of fund |
| Jpmorgan Chase & | $3.8B | 0.2% of fund |
| Peconic Partners | $3.4B | 42.3% of fund |
| Fmr | $2.5B | 0.1% of fund |
132 filers · quarter ended Q2 2026 · positions, not flows
Insiders, last 24 months: 119 Form 4 filings, net −$176.9M. Of the 50 on hand, 0 were open-market purchases and 27 sales— the rest are grants, option exercises and tax withholding.
Ask Orin about PWR
Orin answers questions about PWR from its filings, transcripts and numbers — with the source behind every claim. Your own desk starts with 3 free days, card required.
Start 3 free days →Where it trades
| Metric | Now | Own median | Sector |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 71.8× | 42.1× | 44.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 33.5× | 19.5× | — |
| P/S | 2.91× | 1.50× | — |
| P/B | 9.9× | 5.0× | — |
Its P/E sits above all 5 of the last 5 years (+2.60σ from its own mean).
22.5%
free-cash-flow growth every year for 10 years, discounted at 10%, is what today’s price implies — starting from $1.6B of trailing free cash flow. It is an assumption the market is making, not a forecast Orin is making.
What Wall Street published
$789
$650 – $940 · +25% against today's price
- 26 buy or overweight
- 10 hold
- 0 underweight or sell
The analysts’ consensus and their own ratings, not Orin’s. A target is a twelve-month opinion published by the firm that wrote it.
Against the companies it is compared to
| Company | Market cap | P/E | EV/EBITDA | Gross | Net | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWRQuanta Services, Inc. | $95B | 71.8× | 33.5× | 14.4% | 4.1% | 15% |
| CSXCSX Corporation | $87B | 27.3× | 15.8× | 54.9% | 22.2% | 24% |
| FDXFedEx Corporation | $69B | 15.9× | 9.3× | 22.9% | 4.7% | 15% |
| ITWIllinois Tool Works Inc. | $79B | 24.7× | 18.9× | 44.2% | 19.4% | 102% |
| JCIJohnson Controls International plc | $88B | 25.3× | 27.0× | 36.7% | 14.3% | 27% |
| NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation | $71B | 26.9× | 15.9× | 53.7% | 21.0% | 17% |
| RSGRepublic Services, Inc. | $66B | 30.2× | 14.2× | 39.1% | 12.9% | 18% |
| TDGTransDigm Group Incorporated | $62B | 33.5× | 18.6× | 59.6% | 21.3% | -21% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | $96B | 55.0× | 38.1× | 37.5% | 15.1% | 42% |
The median is of the 8 peers listed above and nothing else — check it against the column. This company trades 165.2% above it. The peer set is the vendor’s, so a company can appear here that a person would not have chosen.
What it has traded at
What its sector has traded at
Two scales, drawn separately on purpose: a sector median and one company’s multiple are not the same number and putting them on one axis invites a comparison neither series supports.
Discounted cash flow
| Model | Fair value | Against | Computed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard DCF | $155 | $650.89 · −76% | 2026-06-10 |
| Levered DCF | $358 | $650.89 · −45% | 2026-06-10 |
The vendor’s intrinsic-value models. Treat them as a low-growth anchor — for a fast grower the market routinely pays well above a DCF. These were computed against the price in the “against” column, not today’s.
Every estimate on one scale
The vertical rule is the current price. Ranges and point estimates are the backend’s, published as they were calculated; an arrow means the estimate sits beyond this scale, and its number is on the right.